Keeping The Masses in Their Masses

If it comes under Section 1 (a), (b) or (c), then you meet criteria to undertake Section 2 (b) (i), (d) (ii) or (f) (iv).  But if you undertake Section 2 (b) (i), (d) (ii) or (f) (iv) then under Regulation 3 it can't be done under Section 1 (a), (b) or (c). Any of the above can be achieved under slip rule X,  but revised amendment rule Y has the effect that there is a discretion for slip rule X to be blocked. Please now note that all of the above is currently being reformed so that a less democratic friendly arrangement can be devised.  When this comes into force on a date prior to the date notification is given, it will effect all decisions from 12 months prior to what might be the date it came into force or an entirely different date, post amendments.  Until then, refer to Schedule 3, then 1, and subsequently 7.  Throughout, consideration must also be given to Article 6 and 8 of the Human Rights Act.   Once that fails in the initial Courts then consider your rights of appeal to the High Court, then subsequently the Court of Appeal, then Europe, all of which require consideration of entirely different more complex law, oh and you might want to consider Judicial Review at any given stage, again requiring consideration of further law.  All of the above must be backed up and can be argued against by way of the alternative and highly ambiguous form of law, that is, former court decisions on all relevant points, known as case law.  Finally, please be aware of all legal loop holes, those we know about can be found elsewhere, for those we don't, please rely on all other sources, otherwise you may, completely by suprise, find one being used against you on the day to great effect.  Should you find any new loop holes yourself, please let us know.